Financial Nihilism
March 12, 2024·38 comments·In Brief
Travis Kling is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Ikigai Asset Management, a L/S multi-strategy crypto asset hedge fund. Travis was an analyst at Magnetar and a PM at Point 72 before going down the crypto rabbit hole and founding Ikigai in 2018. He writes an excellent monthly note which you can find (and sign up for) here, and is a superb Twitter follow @Travis_Kling.
As with all of our guest contributors, Travis’s post may not represent the views of Epsilon Theory or Second Foundation Partners, and should not be construed as advice to purchase or sell any security.

So, apparently last month’s main section “A Lack of Pretense That Any of This Shit Does Anything or Will Ever Do Anything”…was quite a doozy. I’ve been writing these for a long time so I think I have a decent sense of when I write something above or below the average of all the monthlies I’ve written previously. And I knew the one last month was a good one when I wrote it. But even I underestimated how much “A Lack of Pretense…” was going to strike a chord with folks. Because when I turned the main section into a tweet thread, it went properly viral – 2k+ bookmarks, 500k+ views. Big numbers for content that meaty. But it wasn’t just the raw numbers of the response, it was the qualitative characteristics of the response. The thesis REALLY resonated with people. I received many dozens of responses through numerous avenues (Twitter comments, reposts, DMs, Telegrams, text, email, podcasts). By my estimate:
- 80% of the response was strong agreement (with varying levels of begrudgingness);
- 10% was “you don’t know what you’re talking about”; and
- 10% was some form of pushback/disagreement (with varying levels of thoughtfulness).
I did two podcasts in the weeks that followed unpacking the thesis further - you can listen/watch here and here.
Probably the topic within the thesis that garnered the most discussion was the concept of “financial nihilism” – the idea that cost of living is strangling most Americans; that upward mobility opportunity is out of reach for increasingly more people; that the American Dream is mostly a thing of the past; and that median home prices divided by median income is at a completely untenable level. You can click this link and spend 10 mins scrolling through the mentions of “financial nihilism” on Twitter over the last few weeks. It would be 10 minutes well spent.
Given how much discussion this concept sparked and how deeply it resonated with folks, this month we will unpack Financial Nihilism in more detail. To begin, it is not my term. Credit belongs to Demetri Kofinas, the host of the Hidden Forces podcast. He first introduced the concept at least 2 ½ years ago. Financial Nihilism goes hand in hand with Populism - a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups. Populism is a topic I’ve discussed numerous times here in the past, perhaps most pointedly in my February 2021 monthly about Gamestop. The underlying drivers of Financial Nihilism and Populism are the same – this system is not working for me, so I want to try something very different (e.g., buy SHIB or vote for Trump).
How would you go about characterizing the drivers of Financial Nihilism? As previously mentioned, the chart of median home prices to median household income is the single most emblematic symbol of Financial Nihilism in my opinion.
Shown below with a couple annotations –

Source: longtermtrends.net. As of October 2023.
You can see Boomers (and GenX) bought all the houses at about 4.5x annual income. Then subprime lending fueled the housing bubble and the bubble collapsed. Not long thereafter, Millennials entered the workforce and got to the point where they could start buying houses at ~5.5x annual income. Then Covid happened, the Fed printed $6 trillion, and now houses are 7.5x annual income, much higher than even the peak of the housing bubble. Simply out of reach for many millions of Americans under 40. The numbers just don’t add up.
We can drill down into this real estate situation further. Shown below is the share of total real estate value by generation in the US-

Source: FRED. As of Q3-23.
From 1989 to 2023, the total value of US real estate held by households went from $7tn to $45tn, nearly a 7x increase. In 2020, when the youngest Millennial turned 25, Millennials held 13% of total real estate value. In 2005, when the youngest GenX turned 25, their share of housing wealth was 17%. And in 1989, when the youngest Boomer turned 25, they already had 33% of total real estate value. Kind of a raw deal for the current generation of young folks, right?
Let’s keep going though. Here’s the distribution of household wealth by generation. Similar type of chart as above, but looking at total net worth vs just real estate –

Source: FRED. As of Q3-23.
From 1989 to 2023, total US household wealth increased from $20tn to $143tn, a 7x increase.
Drilling down into these numbers, the rise of Financial Nihilism among young people is hardly surprising. In 2020, the youngest Millennial turned 25, and Millennials had a paltry 5% of total household wealth. Compare that to GenX – in 2005 the youngest Gen X’er turned 25, and their generation had already amassed 8% of all household wealth. Then compare that further to Baby Boomers – in 1989 the youngest Boomer turned 25 and by that point the Boomer generation had gathered 20% of total household wealth. Maybe they got that from making coffee at home and skipping the guac at Chipotle!
Looking at these statistics from wealth percentile instead of generation is equally as discouraging-

Source: FRED. As of Q3-23.
Again, total wealth over this time increased 7x from $20tn to $143tn. The top 10%, top 1% and top 0.1% all saw big increases in their relative share over this timeframe, while the bottom 50% actually lost a little ground. Literally watching the rich get richer while the American Dream of upward mobility slips out of reach for the majority. Tough.
Looking at the same analysis for real estate value yields a slightly different looking chart but with the same results –

Source: FRED. As of Q3-23.
The whole pie grows $38tn over this time, and the rich get richer while the Bottom 50% actually lose ground.
I’ll give you one last chart to prove my point before we move on. Below is the ratio of Median Household Income to the S&P 500. Think of it as, “how many shares of the SPX can I buy with a year’s worth of median income?”

Source: FRED. As of Q3-23.
Again, it paints a tough picture. Back in the early 60’s you could get 94 shares of the SPX with the median household income. That peaked in the crash of 1982 at 219 shares and then structurally collapsed. The stock market is getting less and less affordable for the average American.
That’s the setup. The Boomers have all the money. The rich have been getting richer while the poor are getting poorer. The American Dream of upward mobility has been slipping out of reach for increasingly more people. Why do you think Oliver Anthony exploded out of nowhere into such popularity? That is Financial Nihilism. So if you’re like the large majority of Americans and you’re on the wrong end of this, what do you do about it?
You take bigger risks. You feel driven to take bigger risks to try and leapfrog from your current financial position (mostly paycheck to paycheck; buying a home feels nearly impossible; saddled with student loans; salary increases not keeping up expense increases) to something more tenable. More comfortable. More baller.
So you gamble. You. F**king. Gamble. You look anywhere, for anything, that can give you a 5:1, 10:1, 50:1 type of payout. Naturally, you look to literal gambling, which is growing at a breakneck pace-

Source: American Gaming Association.
Within gambling broadly, you look to sports gambling which is now available on your phone while you’re sitting on the couch. Incredible growth rate –

Source: American Gaming Association.
By the way, this year’s Super Bowl? Smashed betting records-

Going even further towards Financial Nihilism, you could look at the rise in the popularity of parlay bets, which include winning multiples of your original bet if you correctly win all bets made in a multi-bet series.

The state of Illinois was the only source I could find that had parlay-specific data going back multiple years. But that insane growth shown in the chart above is indicative of the growth in popularity of parlays broadly. And as a reminder, these are bets where the “house odds” are better than regular bets, even while the potential payoff is much higher. When the numbers don’t add up, might as well swing for the fences even when you’re more likely to strike out.



You know what parlays are kinda like? 0DTE options - options that expire the same day they are bought. Like parlays, 0DTE options offer higher probabilities of loss while offering potentially multiples of upside. Oh yeah, and either way the outcome occurs the same DAY you place the bet…err umm, same day you “make the investment”.
You know what 0DTE options popularity has been doing lately?

0DTE popularity has doubled since Covid. That’s a growth rate that looks familiar, right? Between 2016 and 2023, 0DTE trading increased from 5% of total SPX options volume to 43%.
The evidence for the rise of Financial Nihilism is all around us. Think about the cultural movement that was WallStreetBets, DeepFuckingValue, Gamestop, AMC, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Blockbuster. They cranked out a Seth Rogen movie in like EIGHTEEN MONTHS. That’s how top of mind Financial Nihilism is.
One more thing to add, and then I’ll bring this all back to crypto. Those individuals choosing to act out Financial Nihilism are doing so in direct response to, and in imitation of, the monetary and fiscal policies of the Fed and the US government. Those monetary and fiscal policies have been a major driver of wealth inequality both through generations and wealth percentiles. The US government has been egregiously irresponsible. Makes a poker player look like Dave Ramsey. I’ve talked about this for years here, but I’ll give you a couple reminders-



US been wilin’ with the dollar lately. Bitcoiners were on to this before anyone else. When the government is acting crazy, you might need to do something crazy in response – a 5-leg parlay, 0DTE TSLA calls, or long magic internet money - because the money printer has been, and will continue to, go brrrr. This causes asset price distortions of all sorts. This causes risk-taking distortions of all sorts. You’d be foolish to think otherwise.
Which brings us all the way back to crypto - the Roman Colosseum for asset price and risk-taking distortions. We will do some stuff that makes 0DTE Tesla calls looks like gold sitting in Fort Knox. Our Memecoins do numbers that make the Memestocks look like the DXY-

Source: @flipjpeg. 2/24/24.
Importantly, crypto is a populist movement. A countercultural movement. A YOUNG PERSON’s movement. Boomers don’t get it. It’s “our” thing. It’s the one thing we can actually beat Boomers at (so far). Regardless of whether Boomers show up to crypto now, in the coming years, or not at all, eventually they will leave this world behind for that big country club in the sky. And their assets, which are tremendous –

…will pass down to the next generation. What is going to come of those assets? More gambling. More 0DTE options. More crypto. Be honest with yourself. Run this whole thing out 20-30 years. What do you honestly think it’s going to look like? Like if Dave Portnoy and Ready Player One had a baby.
So What?
I wrote this month’s main section about Financial Nihilism because I believe the concept is such a key driver of crypto price action, and because it struck such a chord with folks last month. I hope you understand it now better than you did a few minutes ago. I feel like I understand it better now than I did when I started writing this. I’ve come away with the view that Financial Nihilism is strong and getting stronger. It’s a feeling that’s pervasive in American society (and abroad). Financial Nihilism is a major driver of crypto price action, you can argue it’s getting even stronger, and it will be with us in a major way this coming cycle.
You can wish that weren’t the case. You can wish the crypto market would be more sound-minded. More sober. More focused on providing solutions to real problems. More rooted in reasonable valuation methodologies. Less bubble-ish. But I believe those wishes will be left ungranted. At least this cycle. There’s good reason to think this market is going to shitcoin harder than ever this cycle. That there will be an even greater “Lack of Pretense That Any of This Shit Does Anything or Will Ever Do Anything”. That we will blow an even bigger bubble and subsequently collapse an even bigger bubble. The drivers of Financial Nihilism and incentive structures that come along with it are simply too overwhelming. Act accordingly.
DISCLOSURES
This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor's individual circumstances and objectives.
Comments
Excellent points - agree on the concerns and risks here.
It’s funny that the term ‘nihilism’ appeared not long before World War I, when it had a social, political, and philosophical meaning.
So, what do we have in common with THAT generation? At first sight, I see ‘breakdown of the out-going world order.’
The narratives that had been fed to the educated class, that free flow of capital benefits all, for example, was confronted with the Argentina default that almost brought down the British banking system. The spread of Western influence, trade and Christianity that was supposed to benefit the world was now questioned by imperial skeptics. The gold standard that underpinned everything was increasingly seen as an agent of misery for the lower classes, and had really become almost laughable when the center of the system, Britain, owned only 3% of the gold required to redeem its paper currency at the official rate.
So, ‘something has to change’ was probably in the air, then as now. It may be true that the previous decades had brought many benefits of modernity to many, if not most countries. And I’m all for it, but it’s a human-run world, and the deep flaws would eventually present themselves obviously. Then as now.
I’m struggling a bit with the causation between low financial wealth as % and increased gambling. I see the linkage but i think there is a whole lot more causation to the increase in gambling in recent years (legal gambling).
On the crypto front, i’ve had the opportunity to speak to some younger folks that own crypto and have created “significant” wealth in BTC and Eretheum…the one common belief i’ve found in them is the distrust of our financial system. The fact that blockchain validates transactions in the system seems to provide them with assurance to maintain/grow their holdings vis-a-vis the non-crypto financial system.
I’m no crypto expert and have educated myself to a small degree over the last 2 years. But this belief in the trust and validity of the crypto system seems to be at their core.
They also seem to be reasonably knowledgable about deficits, $ valuation, gold, etc.
I guess i was struck, shocked, actually that crypto wasn’t a “thing” to do - it was (for these few anyway), a way of life and protection from a system they view as ready to implode.
The disheartening thing about this very prescient view of the world is I would contend it is entirely driven by the Fed/government and the unwillingness to allow any market to actually find a natural clearing price (i.e. go down). And what makes this disheartening is the fact that there is exactly zero evidence that the politics is going to change such that the Fed stops intervening. This means that this process will play out much longer than it ‘should’ but the ultimate denouement will be a much more severe correction.
I fear we have reached the point in the cycle, perhaps never before reached, where all the hopes of the Austrian community seeking monetary sanity can never be attained absent a collapse of everything we currently know and a true restart. I am quite concerned that as the decade’s end approaches, and with it the peak of the 4th turning, it is going to be far worse than anybody is willing to believe. Preppers and end of worlders are likely to be the only ones who are truly prepared.
One thing that has gotten me into trouble in the past as a stock, bond, and commodity investor is over-extrapolating my personal lived experience and that of my immediate peer set to the broader economy and investing accordingly.
This behavior is also the driver of 100% of my success, both personally and professionally, in the real estate market. Why? Because I’m a young Gen-Xer, which is to say that my life naturally front-runs the demand curve of the largest generation in human history, into an asset class with relatively inelastic supply.
I bring this up to make several points that I believe are relevant to the author’s post.
I also worry about what happens 20 - 30 years later, when our largest generation needs to be supported by a smaller one to cover their Social Security and Medicare costs.
Not to mention that SS is currently projected to be insolvent.
You raise many interesting points. I’m especially curious what the median square footage of homes has done over the same period of median home prices and/or affordability.
I think Rob in his post addressed your question. But to expand, when those with the means to own 3-4 homes for personal consumption do so (and why wouldn’t they? they can afford it and it really does make their jet setting lives simpler), that’s a lot of homes removed from the stock. More than I think people expect. As the rich get richer, they buy more homes, yes for rent but also for general consumption.
It is not uncommon to hear from the extremely wealthy something along the following, “Are you referring to my mountain home, my beach home, my main home or my vacation rental?”
The amount of the housing stock overlooks whether it is affordable for the population that needs shelter. The statistics on the median level of savings in the US at retirement are far from encouraging. And, with so many families struggling to afford their current shelter, either via renting or ownership, they can’t also save for their future of non-work. How are millions of future retirees going to be able to remain heads of a household on the $1800 median monthly SS check? Even if that figure compounds at 3.5% over the next decade, that is $2500. This math is why nearly 6% of the US population lives in mobile homes.
Let’s add insult to injury. There are millions of homes that are short term rentals, or second/third/fourth homes which are not part of air bNb and are occupied only a few weeks a year. I attempted to get data on this but it’s either old (2018) or of unknown (to me) reliability.
Channeling the “it’s more just” line from Dr. Zhivago now
Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum...